Average estimates from several ties into one
pool_ties.RdCombines the ties' estimates cell by cell, as a weighted average.
Arguments
- ...
estimator results, named by tie
- estimator
"ind"or"agg"- weights
how to weight the ties:
"inverse-variance"(the default),"equal", or"exposure"(each tie'sdenom.hat)- method
"replicate"to pool within bootstrap replicates,"analytic"for the inverse-variance formula, or"auto"(the default) to use replicates when every input has them
The independence problem, and how to avoid it
The obvious way to pool is inverse-variance weighting, which assumes the estimates being combined are independent. In a multi-tie survey they are not: every tie is reported by the same respondents, so a respondent weighted up perturbs every tie at once.
Where that correlation is positive — which is what shared respondents usually produce — the independence formula gives an interval that is too narrow. It is not guaranteed to err that way, though: with negatively correlated ties it errs the other, and the size of the discrepancy is a property of the data rather than something that can be reasoned out in advance. The point is not the direction. It is that the formula is answering a question about ties that do not exist.
There is a way round it that costs nothing extra if the estimates were
bootstrapped with the same replicate weights. Pool within each replicate,
then take the spread across replicates: whatever correlation the ties have is
already in there, because each replicate perturbs all of them together. That
is method = "replicate", and it is the default wherever the inputs allow
it.
method = "analytic" is the inverse-variance formula, available for when
replicate estimates are not to hand. It warns, because the interval it
produces is not one you should quote without saying how it was made.
Pooling is not the same as union
This treats each tie as a separate estimate of one quantity and averages
them. It does not add the ties' reports together — that is union, it
double-counts any alter reachable through more than one tie, and it needs
information this package does not carry. See ties_union_check().
See also
compare_ties(), which is usually worth doing first